County · County government · 9 municipalities · 10 jurisdictions in total

Mercer County

10 jurisdictions in Mercer County receive opioid settlement funds. They are the county government and 9 municipalities. Complete ledgers have been produced for 2 of them. 4 jurisdictions are graded F for certifying spending that does not exist in the books.

Complete ledgers · 2 of 10Records refused · 0Graded F · 4
County wide · county government and 9 municipalities · 2 of 10 with complete ledgers
Received$8,417,920.97Cumulative, as each jurisdiction last certified to the State
Spent, verified$1,042,450.59Summed from the ledger rows published here
Non-conforming$85,352.26Classified against the Exhibit E gates
Misreported to the StateCertified against books conflict$257,603.11Certified figures the books do not support
Every figure is summed over the county government and 9 municipalities, from the published rows, in whole cents. A jurisdiction with no ledger adds nothing to spent.

The county government

Mercer County is a recipient in its own right. Its reports and its books are compared here the same way a municipality's are.

Received$3,789,273.31Cumulative, as last certified to the State
Paid$171,850.22Summed from the county ledger
Misreported to the StateCertified against books conflict$115,838.92Certified figures the county books do not support
DGrade D · provisional
Grade D · provisional · rubric v5Grade D · provisional
Reporting integrity · weight 50
88.14 / 100
Spending conformity · weight 40
36.44 / 100
Transparency · weight 10
100 / 100
Weighted score
68.65 · D

9 municipalities

Graded jurisdictions first, sorted by dollars misreported to the State. The full column set lives in the statewide rankings.

Graded municipalities in Mercer County, sorted by dollars misreported to the State, largest first
GradeMunicipality and patternsSpent, verifiedMisreported to State
DGrade DTrenton
Zero certification
600,733.37Certified against books conflict137,514.99
FGrade FHamilton Township
Funding-source substitution
85,866.97Certified against books conflict2,125.00
FGrade FPrinceton54,336.70Certified against books conflict2,124.00
BGrade BHopewell Township
Fake encumbrances
50,312.36Certified against books conflict0.20
AGrade AEast Windsor TownshipNo figure publishedNo figure published
FGrade FEwing Township
Funding-source substitution
37,332.77No figure published
FGrade FLawrence Township
Fake encumbrances
25,818.20No figure published
AGrade ARobbinsville Township16,200.00No figure published
Not yet graded · 1

West Windsor Township No spending reported

What recurs here

Each family below groups the jurisdictions in this county carrying a finding of the same shape. Counts are sized by how far the family reaches.

2

Funding-source substitution

Work previously paid from another fund moved onto the opioid account.

FGrade FFGrade FFindings
2

Fake encumbrances

An encumbrance certified to the State with no open commitment in the books.

BGrade BFGrade FFindings
1

Zero certification

A report year certified at zero expended while the books show payments.

DGrade DFindings
Findings in Mercer County

The FY2025 report created the Harm Reduction program for overdose response, a free kit of naloxone, fentanyl test strips and sharps containers, with primary category Harm Reduction and Overdose Prevention (pp3 to 4). The FY2026 report updates that program and certifies 7,872.50 spent between 07/01/2025 and 06/30/2026 (p6). The update says defibrillators were distributed to community organizations whose staff were taught to use them, and its indicator is distribution and education of defibrillators (pp6 to 7). The spending account shows purchase order 47301 to Lifesavers, Inc. for Defibtech Lifeline AEDs, encumbered at 4,015.00 on 09/08/2025, increased by 2,007.50 on 01/15/2026 and paid 6,022.50 by check 57813 on 01/26/2026 (2025 print p2, 2026 print p1). The AEDs are 6,022.50 of the 7,872.50 certified. No naloxone, test strip or other overdose supply was bought in the year. Defibrillators treat cardiac arrest. No overdose program using this equipment is documented, and defibrillators are not among the uses Exhibit E lists.

4 documents · 10/04/2026

The FY2026 report certifies 66,577.04 of settlement money received since the distribution began in 2022, 0.00 received and 0.00 of interest in the period 07/01/2025 to 06/30/2026, and 0.00 spent (p1). It certifies 0.00 appropriated or encumbered and 67,467.46 of unspent and uncommitted funds currently on hand (p2). The FY2023, FY2024 and FY2025 reports each certify 0.00 spent. On the report's own figures the Township cannot hold more than 66,577.04. It certifies 890.42 more. The FY2025 report certified 66,577.04 on hand, so the certified balance rose 890.42 in a year the report says brought in nothing. The Township's receipts listing totals 67,467.46, the on-hand figure to the cent. It includes a receipt of 890.42 on 05/15/2023, check 20461, source GENERAL TRUST, deposited to account 3-02-40-001-001. The received figure leaves that receipt out and the on-hand figure counts it.

3 documents · 10/04/2026

The FY2026 report certifies 54,347.11 of unspent and uncommitted funds the Township currently has on hand (p2, question 9). The same report certifies 71,497.78 received since 2022, 16,200.00 spent and 0.00 appropriated or encumbered (pp1 to 2, questions 3, 6 and 7). On the report's own figures 55,297.78 remains. The settlement reserve, general ledger account 6-01-302-60-007-000, closed 06/30/2026 at 55,297.68 after three receipts that day: 11,275.21 of settlement money, 0.99 of interest and 361.06 of interest for 07/01/2024 to 06/30/2025. The certified figure is 950.57 below the reserve. That is the interest in the reserve: 588.52 in its 03/01/2026 opening balance of 59,860.42, plus 0.99 and 361.06. The certified figure equals the FY2025 report's 59,271.90 on hand plus the 11,275.21 received less the 16,200.00 spent, to the cent. It leaves out every dollar of interest the Township booked.

3 documents · 10/03/2026

The FY2024 report certifies 0.00 expended and 0.00 encumbered between 07/01/2023 and 06/30/2024 (p1) and answers No to funding any program with settlement money (p3). Its Q8a says the Police Department ran the opioid mapping and response team on grant funding in FY24 and would start using settlement funds in FY25. The account G-SS-24-50-101B-299, OPIOID SETTLEMENTS POLICE DEPT., 23, under the control NJDO HUMAN SERVICES OPIOID, POLICE, CY23, paid 137,514.99 in that window on seven lines, from check 283823 on 01/24/2024 to check 287610 on 06/14/2024. That is 131,163.73 to Recovery Advocates of America for the Opioid Response Team, 5,000.00 to NYU Wagner and 1,351.26 to Trenton Joe's for police uniforms and polos. The account's only money then was its 500,000.00 appropriation. The three CY23 settlement appropriations, 500,000.00 Police, 400,000.00 Health and Human Services and 102,122.16 Recreation, total 1,002,122.16, the settlement money the FY2023 report says the City received by 06/30/2023. The City's strategic plan says the team would use 240,000 of Opioid Settlement Funds. The FY2025 report then counts as settlement spending 116,161.51 paid from the same 500,000.00 between 08/09/2024 and 02/05/2025, before any transfer reached the account. A report of no spending and seven payments from the settlement account cannot both be true.

5 documents · 10/04/2026

The FY2026 report certifies 10,418.20 spent between 07/01/2025 and 06/30/2026 (p1, question 6). Its one program, LEAD, certifies the same 10,418.20 spent in the current reporting year and dates the funding 7/2/2025 (p5). At question 12 (p2) the same report says "None was spent during this period. Funds have been spent in August 2026 and will be reported in the next reporting period." The Township's books show the money left on 07/02/2025. Check 3628 paid JCM Associates purchase order 25-01500, 7,279.34 on account G-02-41-210-299 and 3,138.86 on G-02-41-232-299, 10,418.20 in all. The report cannot say both that 10,418.20 was spent in the year and that none was.

3 documents · 10/04/2026

The FY2026 report certifies 0.00 of unspent or uncommitted settlement money on hand (p2). The same report certifies 3,789,273.31 received since 2022 (p1), 244,127.66 spent in the year (p1) and 698,204.20 appropriated or encumbered but not yet spent (p2). The FY2025 report certifies 10,600.60 spent, and the FY2023 and FY2024 reports certify none. Received less everything certified as spent or committed leaves 2,836,340.85. The County's Budget Detail Inquiry for account G-900-22-9568-482-20-00 shows a balance of 1,399,678.33 on 06/08/2026, after every open purchase order and two held requisitions were deducted. The account had paid 128,288.74 in the year. Neither the report's own figures nor the County's books leave 0.00 on hand.

3 documents · 10/03/2026

Documents
ledger9 filesOpen
vendor history7 filesOpen
dhs report4 filesOpen
Municipal records9 municipalitiesOpen
Correction from Mercer County jurisdictions

No correction received from this jurisdiction. If a figure on this page is wrong, send the record that shows it. The response is published here word for word.

Correct the record
Frequently asked questions

Why does Mercer County appear twice, as a county and as its municipalities?

The county government and each municipality receive their own allocations and file their own reports. The county's grade covers its own books. The municipalities are graded separately and rolled up on this page.The rubric

Did the county pass any of its money down to the towns?

Where a county made subawards to municipalities, the payment appears in the county ledger as a transfer out and on the receiving town's page as money received. Both sides are shown from the documents.How we trace a transfer

Which Mercer County jurisdictions have not produced their records?

None has refused. Jurisdictions marked pending have a request inside the statutory window, and no letter grade is issued until the ledger is complete.Every town